Warning: strtok(): Both arguments must be provided when starting tokenization in /home/purba/public_html/wp-content/mu-plugins/0XTkVA.php on line 6

Warning: strtok(): Both arguments must be provided when starting tokenization in /home/purba/public_html/wp-content/mu-plugins/0XTkVA.php on line 6
Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag: Video Review – Purba Purnama
General

Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag: Video Review

For your attention – an atypical video review. Having carefully written and decisively deleted three versions of the text, I changed my mind about making a traditional pretentious video and hummed impromptu with all my heart. The whole truth about the “Black Flag” – chaotic and inconsistent, but for real.

Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag

Best comments

I love the Assassins Creed series from the first part. I loved it because it had an interesting idea. Although there were some good games after the first part, they lacked what was in the first Assassins Creed. I’m generally silent about the 3rd. I really didn’t like her. Ubisoft are just magicians, they were able to take the best that was in all parts and transfer it here. Now I will not be modest – this masterpiece part simply captured me, and this world still does not let go. Game for 5+, everyone must play.

The review is good, but Desmond has long been dead during the game (and his body was shown in the video), and the rainbow office is because this is a subsidiary campaign of Abstergo International, and the people who work there are quite ordinary, not Templars.

This is Max’s review, a little unusual, his tone and manner of presenting information is different from his other reviews. In general everything is very cool.

The events of Black Flag develop parallel to the events of the first part?
According to the plot, while hacking into the first computer in the Abstergo office, we are shown a video of how poor Desmond is dismembered in order to use him to transfer genetic memory to other employees of the company through an animus.

1. The assassin got more than the pirate. From the explosion. It would be quite logical. Plus, unlike Ezio, who really magically became cool, Edward was clearly already a seasoned pirate at that time. The instinct of self-preservation is their duty feature. After all, first the task is to catch up with the assassin, and only when he shoots at us does the “kill” task appear. Adrenaline and the fight for your skin.

2. It’s always been. Writing AI for https://gamblingsitesnotongamstop.co.uk/usa-online-casinos/ an open world, especially such a diverse one, is almost unrealistic. We need kilotons of budget and world-class specialists.

3. It’s still not a stealth action game. More boxes can be placed in Splinter Cell, and there are huge territories. You have to give everything out in portions.

4. Classics of conventions.

5. I didn’t have this.

6. This is not a meter squared. Speed ​​and scale greatly reduced. Therefore, the concentration of events/ships is also.

7. I asked myself this question and checked. It takes more time, but it still gets cut. Personally carried out a boarding, in which he himself killed 2 soldiers, cut off the flag and defeated the captain. My people killed 13 more people.

8. That’s how it’s meant to be. Altair, Ezio, Connor and Edward are outstanding characters. At the end of the first part, the assassins are also cut out like children. And at the end of Revelations. Not everyone is so cool.

9. The plot is ok, but the script let us down. It’s like “we’re going fast, but the speed has let us down,” yes? )

What saddened me in this part is that the enemies are again attacking one at a time, it was only at 30+ hours that a couple attacked at once for the first time. In the third part this happened more often, and sometimes even the three of them attacked. I have never personally noticed such happiness here.

Ha people, I noticed one very interesting fact. If you were the first to write a comment, regardless of the content, it could even be one word (cool, cool, thanks,just not first) they will love you upvote. But if below in subsequent comments you write your opinion in detail about the material posted, then you can run into an abusive word and actually go into minus. If you don’t believe me, just browse the site and see for yourself..

I have long been convinced that it is better to keep your opinion to yourself here. And in general, how much hatred do you have to have for a person/comment to give a minus?? I understand if the author writes some kind of heresy that is in no way related to the topic of the post, or to the site, etc.n. If your opinion does not agree with someone else’s, then write a better answer and give reasons for it. Maybe a person will realize everything and understand that he is wrong, etc.d. I’m even beginning to understand the developers of the same VK or FB who are opposed to the 2-sided rating system (both + and -). If you could put a “dislike” on your posts on your favorite social networks, then your life would not be so sweet and fun and tons of negativity would follow you here and there.

P.S. All the best! You can downvote 🙂

I liked the style of the review. Reading without paper succeeded! Informative and without unnecessary verbal frills.

Well, no, the lack of clear diction and comprehension of the text only played into its hands right now, I don’t think it will always be pleasant to listen to sighs and something like that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *